«

»

Jun 25

Is There An Autistic Personality?

Autism is a different way of being in the world, and that difference arises in the brain. The neuronal networks of an autistic brain are somehow different from those of a typical brain. We know quite a bit about many of these differences, although it is not always clear what is the relationship between differences in brain qualities and the hallmarks of autism (certain behaviors, and the different ways of processing information).

Because there is no definitive “biomarker” (e.g. blood test or DNA test) for autism, diagnosing someone as autistic is currently a subjective process that relies primarily on observed behavior, as well as on performance in tests that are designed to ferret out underlying thinking patterns.

One of the most serious flaws, it seems to me, in most descriptions of autism, as well as in diagnostic regimens (such as the DSM), is that they were developed and written by people who are not autistic. It’s a bit disconcerting to read an explanation of a state of mind that has not been experienced by the author. I imagine it is analogous to reading a travel guide about the beautiful Berkshire Hills of western Massachusetts, where I live, written by someone who has never visited.

This essay is an exploration of the idea that there may be an Autistic Personality Type.

If that is true, it may be that a fairly simple personality test would provide a reliable autism screening tool. Many autistic adults have learned to mask the behavioral markers that would be tell-tale signs of autism in younger people. These adults came of age in an era when autism awareness was low or virtually non-existent, and never received the diagnosis that they might have been given in today’s environment. In my own experience, and in my observation of many other autistic adults, self-awareness is one important key to reducing the anxiety that accompanies being autistic, and to unblocking many of the barriers to self-acceptance and to enjoying life to its fullest.

Neuroscience Confirms What I Have Long Suspected

In prior writings and talks, I have jokingly referred to “The Woody Allen Syndrome” – the character he convincingly plays in his early movies. He is socially awkward to the point of inept; he is convinced that the worst possible outcome is about to occur; he is paranoid, pessimistic, and unfocused. He feels unloved and unappreciated, and when something does go wrong, he retreats into a prolonged period of depression and self-recrimination.

Well, it turns out that there is some scientific support that this description may just fit the typical person who is autistic. Which is not to say that everyone who is autistic can be characterized this way, nor does it mean that everyone who has this “Syndrome” is autistic. But, if there is a high degree of correspondence, this description (or, rather, a more scientific formulation of it) may provide important information about the likelihood of someone being autistic.

Details Another Time – Here Are the Key Concepts

It was once thought that two separate areas of the brain were responsible for our emotional life versus our intellectual one. Control of feelings was believed to be solely centered in the more primitive subcortical limbic system. Thought, on the other hand, logically came from the more highly evolved neocortex. As it happens, things are a lot more complicated than that, with both of these areas of the brain involved in emotional as well as intellectual functioning.

Part of the very good news that arises from this understanding is that we can consciously change the way we react to things. We can adjust our responses and, indeed, our very personality styles. This is a topic for another time, but I wanted to mention it here because it is important to know that, if we are not happy with the emotional traits we now possess, we can work to change them. Read on!

Rate Yourself on the Six Dimensions of Emotional Style

The discussion here follows from the categories presented in The Emotional Life of Your Brain, by Richard Davidson with Sharon Begley, Hudson Street Press, 2012.

Neuroscientists have observed that there are six different and distinct brain patterns that are activated during emotional response. This list is an approximate mapping to those patterns. Over the years, psychologists and neurologists have proposed many classification schemes for personality types and for related concepts. Those schemes were based on careful observation, intuition, and controlled testing. So, they had (and have) a certain validity, but they were not based, as these are, on direct observation of brain functioning. My hunch is that, over time, these approaches will be harmonized, so that the best of both will survive and inform us. In the meantime, have some fun with this new structure.

You can rank yourself on a scale of 1 to 5, or just high or low, or plus or minus, or any way that is useful to you. In any case, you will get the drift.

  1. Resilience: how quickly do you recover from shock or adversity?
  2. Outlook: how long can you sustain a positive emotional state?
  3. Social Intuition: can you pick up on and respond to social signals from those around you?
  4. Self-Awareness: do you act on impulse or out of understanding of your emotional state? Are you hyper-aware of your physical surroundings (sensory overload)?
  5. Sensitivity to Context: can you regulate your actions well enough to behave in ways that are conventionally expected?
  6. Attention: how focused are you on the task at hand?

Now, these are very shorthand descriptions of these emotional styles, but I’m sure you can see that they each cover a unique domain of behavior, and, taken together, they provide a pretty complete description of the components of an overall emotional style.

How Does This Relate to More Traditional Categories of Personality Traits?

One of the more widely used schemes is called “the big five” and often goes by the acronym OCEAN.

  1. Openness (inventive/curious vs. consistent/cautious)
  2. Conscientiousness (efficient/organized vs. easy-going/careless)
  3. Extraversion (outgoing/energetic vs. solitary/reserved)
  4. Agreeableness (friendly/compassionate vs. cold/unkind)
  5. Neuroticism (sensitive/nervous vs. secure/confident)

According to Davidson and Begley, these can be mapped with their new list as follows:

  1. Openness: Socially Intuitive, Self-Aware, and Focused
  2. Conscientiousness: Socially Intuitive, Focused, and Sensitive to Context
  3. Extraversion: Resilient, Positive Outlook
  4. Agreeableness: Sensitive to Context, Resilient, Positive Outlook
  5. Neuroticism: Not Resilient, Negative Outlook, Insensitive to Context, Unfocused

In the last one, substitute High Self-Awareness for “Insensitive to Context” and you have described a personality trait they label as “anxious” – put “neuroticism” and “anxious” together and I think you have the “Woody Allen Syndrome” also known (so say I) as The Autistic Personality. A couple of caveats are in order here: one concerns self-awareness – autistic people are more likely, I believe, to be highly self-aware of their physical surroundings, but less so about their own emotional state. Also, there are areas not explicitly covered in these lists that have to do with motor skills and communication difficulties, both of which can be very reliable clues that a person is autistic.

And, yes, I’m aware that not everyone is the same, and one can be autistic and not share all of these traits. Plus, the “Attention” category is a bit problematic, I think, because (in my experience at least), an autistic person probably lives at both ends of the spectrum – totally focused at one moment to the exclusion of the surrounding world, and then flitting on to the next thing, and the next.

Also, there are attributes that I associate with autism that are not really covered here; such as our obsessive need for perfection. We have high standards, and none higher than for ourselves! There are also outward-oriented characteristics, such as extreme empathy for other people, as well as for non-human animals. And a strong sense of social justice. Then there is the dimension of “Attention” that is longer than “the task at hand” – we have “deep interests” that may occupy us for weeks, months, or even a lifetime.

One striking thing about that last list is that all of the first four traits are made up of nothing but positive emotional styles. The last one is the only one with negative styles, and it has nothing but negatives. Again, this is not to say, by any means, that everyone who is “neurotic” is autistic. But I bet it’s pretty safe to say that anyone who is autistic lives in the world described by this list of negative attributes. Or, at least, that is our natural habitat. I have worked hard to change many of my intuitive responses, and, I think, with some success. Yet, I still feel the pull of those dark forces.

The Autistic Personality is What We Are Born With: We Can Choose to Change!

The good news is that it is possible to change, even though it is, without question, hard work. The high plasticity of the autistic brain makes it very difficult for us to be resilient (the opposite of “plastic” is “elastic” which describes something that snaps back quickly). Yet, that same plasticity enables us to learn quickly and to reshape our brains. It takes self-awareness, willingness, and effort. And, believe me, it is worth it!

I would love to get feedback and thoughts on all of this. Your comments are invited and welcome.

My exploration continues in Part II.

6 comments

2 pings

Skip to comment form

  1. LucyMB

    Thanks Michael, very interesting.
    My first thought is about changes over time. My score in some of these categories would have been wildly different in my teens or 20s than it is my 40s. To me, resilience and outlook are way too broad as they stand (for identifying autism/Woody Allen), since both can be seriously diminished in various biological types or by different experiences (and likewise enhanced).
    Resilience could reflect the ability to handle surprises/change/transition, which would more useful for these purposes if it were narrowed in that way.

  2. Michael Forbes Wilcox

    Lucy, thanks so much for your response. I agree with your comments about things changing over time. I actually had difficulty getting the AS clinical diagnosis I requested, after self-diagnosing at age 58 or 59. I was so good at masking my autism that the psychologist was fooled. Of course, I didn’t really mean to do this, but it had become an ingrained habit. It was only after I had her talk with someone who knew me well that she gave me the diagnosis.

    Many of the existing “tests” for AS/autism (whether self-administered or not) have questions that are so transparent that one could almost choose what diagnosis one wants. And, again, I think that’s because these tests are made up by non-autistics, who are looking at the outward signs of autism, and not what it’s really like to BE autistic.

    And, yes, the answers to many of those standardized questions (relating to autism or not) would be very different it you thought about how you were when you were younger (proof that our brains, autistic or not, are very plastic over time). I took the ADOS test (reputed to be the “gold standard” of autism diagnosis) and found it to be laughable. They claimed there was an adjustment for age, but that was a total crock.

    Please keep in mind that I gave a very sketchy outline of the attributes the authors of he book provided. They really have a much more sophisticated presentation but I didn’t want to get into the details.

    Also, the authors have a very traditional view of autism; as a “disease” or a “disorder” — something I find very offensive. They specifically talk about eye contact as evidence of “abnormality” — without the benefit of having experienced the discomfort. I say “authors” btw but there is clearly one author and one editor/ghostwriter, since much of what is presented is in the first person.

    I don’t want to get into the whole thing here, but briefly: they provide evidence from video analysis and brain scans that autistics don’t do/aren’t comfortable with eye contact. They jump to the (false, imho) conclusion that this impairs social functioning. On the surface, what they say is true. Yet, the reason eye contact is uncomfortable for me is that it is information overload. I don’t need to stare into your eyes to know your emotional state. All I need is an occasional glance. We are so good at processing information that we don’t need much. More anon.

    Again, thanks for commenting!

  3. Carla

    Interesting thoughts. I myself am not autistic/asperger but my 17 year old son is. I think the most difficult aspect of the “category” is that there are probably 100 plus traits and nuances one could propose as diagnostic measures, but each person who is actually diagnosed has a different combination of the traits, not all traits, and in different intensities. These amazing folks are as different within that population as is the general population. I am not sure exactly what your stand is on the issues you have presented, because I only skimmed the text, but I would acknlowledge that some of the character traits can be unpleasant for fellow members of the community at large, but I do not think they should be in anyway associated with mental disorders or neurotic tendancies because those traits for a person with autism do not come out of the same functions with in the brain or as a result of similar conditions that would create the persona that a “Woody Allen” character presents. It has been very detrimental to my son at every turn when his behaviors and opinions were viewed through a mental illness lense, including the use of meds and talk therapies. Absolutely useless and demeaning to him. There can of course be behaviors and thoughts that develop as a result of having been misunderstood or demeaned all one’s life, that could be helped my therapy or meds, but that is secondary to the autism. It would be my preference for any description of personality traits to be worded without “judgemental phrases” and I dont think a nuerosis is a personality trait, I see it as a mental illness to be handled. I see a distinction between the 2 ideas.

  4. Michael Forbes Wilcox

    Carla,

    Thanks for your comments.

    If you read my other recent post, http://www.mfw.us/blog/2012/06/28/recent-autism-research-a-synopsis/, I talk about how there is no “spectrum” of autism; just as you say, we are all unique individuals with our own combination of traits.

    I think we are long past the time when autism was thought of as a mental health disorder. At least, those of us who are autistic are beyond that. Maybe not the rest of the world!

    You touch on a key concept I’ve been struggling with. We know that the autistic brain develops more slowly than the neurotypical brain. Because of this, we are placed in a position of being expected to do more than we are capable of, and being criticized/punished/traumatized as a result. Eventually, our brains catch up and maybe even go on beyond what the neurotypical brain is capable of. Yet, during the period of delay, we may be, as you put it, “misunderstood or demeaned” and that can lead to serious deficiencies in self-acceptance, to say the least. As we approach and enter adulthood, we may have developed defensive strategies that become dysfunctional. Is our inability to fit in because we are autistic or because we have been mistreated? A topic for another day.

  5. ira

    Normals have traditionally way of making the same atrubutes mimicking autistics by negative ways listings of defective well what about studiousness ?and diligence as well as industrious?even creativity?maybe it seems judgemental really leniency or strictness and in middle?conscioustantous to beliefs might be even in contextual knowledge. Obsession with communication others doe have so it is a differnce isolation obsession? Compulsive sensory avoidance evening cause of pain and illnesses that will certainly result seems to have a need for food and beverages along with comfort and resting and exercising . socializing is well it is necessary it eventually is harmoniousness to honesty or chaosness of deceitfulness well I have by nature laws in nature am imperfect so even when saying there is obsession with perfection it seems it reslly was just a tendency for occupation obession with intelligence well others will obession with will in a imperfection as a justice would have a recognition of eternity obession on living forever and where ot will be. So as I am autistic in mind personality has been justly it differently evily would even normals as well as autistics. I really appreciate it if autistics give diagnoses and prognosis on autism and asbergers so justfaction will be right even as empathetic and logicism both of which are incorporated weaven for reasons rationality and sociality.

    1. ira

      What happened add variety of autistics whom share only some of treats in at continuum on a spectrum in opposite ways. art mathematics language music sports are chooces .the reasoning is that I would love to have same powers of mind in combination with normals mental powers as it relates to health and desiring of mental abilities of that is in everyone autistics from whom despondent or enthusiastic about being normal in intellectuelle mental cognition a idiopathic beliefs of autistics whom if intelligence is in operation functionality of savant dellemma and performance of genius will power.

  1. Is There An Autistic Personality? Part II | Michael Forbes Wilcox

    [...] Part I of this series, I noted several discordances between autistic characteristics, as I see them, and [...]

  2. On Beyond Brain Plasticity | Michael Forbes Wilcox

    [...] Life of Your Brain, by Richard Davidson with Sharon Begley, Hudson Street Press, 2012. The first and second of this series addressed my speculation that there is a distinct autistic personality [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>