{"id":253,"date":"2012-01-20T07:47:51","date_gmt":"2012-01-20T12:47:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mfw.us\/blog\/?p=253"},"modified":"2012-01-20T14:59:33","modified_gmt":"2012-01-20T19:59:33","slug":"is-it-time-to-abandon-the-dsm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mfw.us\/blog\/2012\/01\/20\/is-it-time-to-abandon-the-dsm\/","title":{"rendered":"Is It Time to Abandon the DSM?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Is It Time to Abandon the DSM?<\/strong>
\nControversy Over Autism May Present an Opportunity<\/p>\n

January 20, 2012<\/p>\n

\u00a92012 Michael Forbes Wilcox<\/p>\n

“…disability is a natural part of the human experience…”<\/p>\n

From The Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000<\/a> (originally passed in 1990, and commonly referred to as \u201cThe DD Act\u201d)<\/p>\n

The American Psychiatric Association Is No Longer Relevant<\/strong><\/p>\n

The American Psychiatric Association<\/a> (APA) has been the focus of intense controversy in recent months, as it struggles to revise its Bible<\/a>, the \u201cDSM\u201d \u2013 the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
\nThere is an article<\/a><\/strong> in today’s New York Times which brings attention to the latest twist in this saga.
\nThe opening paragraph of the article summarizes the stark future possibly faced by those of us in the autism community who are working for more inclusion:
\n\u201cProposed changes in the definition of autism would sharply reduce the skyrocketing rate at which the disorder is diagnosed and might make it harder for many people who would no longer meet the criteria to get health, educational and social services, a new analysis suggests<\/em>.\u201d
\nWhether the study cited in the article proves to be accurate or not, this whole controversy raises the question of whether the APA should be the arbiter of the diagnosis of autism.
\nIn my view, the DSM has outlived its usefulness as a diagnostic tool for autism.
\nYes, I understand that the practical difficulties of moving away from the DSM are not insignificant. It is cited in legislation as the authority on autism even in bills such as the Massachusetts ARICA<\/a> law, which was put into place in 2010 to\u00a0(supposedly)\u00a0redefine autism as a medical condition.<\/p>\n

Autism Is Not a Psychiatric Condition<\/strong><\/p>\n

As noted, we (the autism community) have gone to great lengths to have autism categorized, for insurance purposes, as a medical condition, not a “mental health” (or psychiatric) one. So, how does the APA have the power to decide what autism is? Do they define what diabetes is? I don’t think so.
\nWe are in the trap of buying into the behavioral model. Autism is a neurological condition, not a behavioral one. Since there is no widely-accepted objective test that will identify someone as autistic, we are left with a behavioral, subjective diagnostic process. This is, I suppose, how the APA retains a toehold. And, of course, to uphold the tradition\/myth that only psychiatrists are qualified to prescribe psychotropic medications<\/a>.
\nPerhaps we are fighting the wrong fight. Why argue with the APA? Why not work in other areas to ensure that Asperger’s and related learning differences are recognized in the world at large as disabilities that need to be treated on a par with any other disability that creates a barrier to full inclusion or to gaining full potential?
\nYes, I realize my suggestion raises a whole host of other questions and challenges. Who, then, defines what is autism\/Asperger’s etc.? Who is qualified to diagnose? I have a non-clinical view (my chief qualification in this field being that I am autistic), and I’m sure there are many complications of which I’m not aware, but I have faith that, if properly worked out, things should not be all that much different from the way they are today.
\nIt seems to me that by engaging in this pissing contest<\/a> with the APA, we cede to them their authority over the autism community and grant them the right to define how the English language is to be used. If you accept their definition, autism is a “disorder” — I disagree.<\/p>\n

I welcome feedback and comments.<\/p>\n

On Beyond Zebra<\/strong><\/p>\n

We all know that language is important (and none was a greater illustrator of its power than Dr. Seuss<\/a>!).
\nIn a forthcoming essay, I will argue that \u201cAutism is Just Autism\u201d \u2013 and discuss (among other things) the following points:<\/p>\n

This essay examines some of the language commonly used when referring to autism, and suggests some changes that might soften the negative aspects of those words and phrases. Among others, these concepts are discussed:<\/p>\n